Why Boys Fail
Saving Our Sons from an Educational System That's Leaving Them Behind
Author: Richard Whitmire
Pub Date: September 2011
Print Edition: $15.95
Print ISBN: 9780814420171
Page Count: 256
Format: Paper or Softback
e-Book ISBN: 9780814420362
Buy the book:
INTRODUCTION TO THE PAPERBACK EDITION
At first glance, it might appear that the ‘‘boy troubles’’ are
on their way to being solved. Much has changed since the original
publication of Why Boys Fail nearly two years earlier, and many of
those changes appear to be positive. At that time, the suggestion that
boys were in trouble and falling behind in school was hotly debated,
with many people including national feminist groups denying that boys
were in trouble. After the book was published, I debated doubters at
the National Press Club, at a panel at the American Enterprise Institute,
and on the pages of numerous education journals.
Today, those counterarguments have pretty much washed away, partly
due to the recession, which has hit men so much harder than women. At
one point, nearly 80 percent of the job losses were among men, in part
because they held jobs that required less education. It was a ringing re-
minder of how much better educated women have become. Reflecting
that situation are the obvious gender imbalances on college campuses,
with more campuses spilling over the already uncomfortable threshold of
60 percent women. One speech I gave on this topic was at the College of
Charleston in South Carolina, where there are twice as many female as
male students. The dilemma has become embarrassingly visible, which
makes denying the problem a losing argument.
In August 2010, the Atlantic ratcheted up the debate with a cover
story titled ‘‘The End of Men,’’ which explored the reasons the world
seems to have tilted in favor of women.1 Writer Hanna Rosin pointed out
something that may surprise many: These days, parents prefer having girls
over boys. Why not go with the winners? The cover story illustrated that
the mainstream press no longer considers the boy problems exotic issues
to debate. Rather, newspaper reporters and magazine writers have ac-
cepted the basic premise and prefer to focus on more targeted issues, such
as the controversies surrounding how brains are wired: Do boys and girls
really learn differently and therefore need different classroom strategies or
even separate classes? (A lot hinges on answering that question correctly.)
There’s a sense that solutions to the boy problems are in the works.
Many educators worried about boys falling behind are encouraged by the
proliferation of single-sex classrooms or schools. As of spring 2011, more
than 500 schools across the country offered single-sex education options
to parents. The state of South Carolina alone was watching over 127
single-gender programs during the 2010–11 school year that involved
around 20,000 students. In many urban areas, where African-American
boys have fallen so far behind they risk disappearing, the best and brightest
hope appears to be single-sex charter schools. The all-boys high school
in Chicago run by Urban Prep Academies draws national press attention
for sending 100 percent of its graduates to college.
All that sounds encouraging. But in truth, one fundamental fact has
not changed: Every day, thousands of parents wake up and ask themselves,
Why have our sons lost interest in school?
Despite the fresh attention being paid to the problems of boys,
many of the key indicators tracking how boys are faring are getting
worse, not better. In the late winter of 2010, higher education consultant
Tom Mortenson, who is considered the dean of the ‘‘boy troubles’’
experts, put together a past-five-year tracking indicator targeting males.
What he found was a decline—and worse. ‘‘By these measures the state
of adult male welfare is generally worse today than it was five years ago,
and in fact is the worst ever in recorded history, which is generally since
World War II.’’2
According to Mortenson:
■ Male labor force participation rates are the worst they have
ever been in data since 1948.
■ The employed-population ratio for males is the worst it has
been in data since 1948.
■ The male unemployment rate is the highest it has ever been
in data since 1948.
■ The average number of weekly hours worked for men is the
lowest it has ever been in data back to 1956.
■ Median annual income for men peaked in 1973 and is currently
well below the 1973 level.
The consequences of these conditions are felt in the family lives of
■ The share of men 35 to 44 years and 45 to 54 years that have
never been married is at record highs in data dating back to
■ The share of young men living at home with their parents is
high by historical standards, but below past levels.
■ The share of children born to unwed mothers is at recordhigh
levels in data dating back to 1940. This finding holds
for all racial/ethnic groups.
■ The share of children with a father is near record lows in data
dating back to 1960.
Search the full text of this book
Search Full Text of
For single copy purchases of any AMACOM title, you can connect directly to the online retailer of your choice, from the list below, to buy the title you have selected. Most of our links will take you directly to that title on the site, making your shopping experience easier. You can also visit your local retailer, and if the book is not on their shelves they can special order it for you.
Retailers: Please contact us to change or add a listing.
Buying in Bulk?
We have very competitive discounts starting at 5 copies, as well as personal service, for bulk orders. Simply contact our Special Sales Department. Call 800-250-5308 or 212-903-8420 and ask for Special Sales. You can also email: SpecSlsWeb@amanet.org